|
quiz
Feb 16, 2006 23:30:12 GMT -4
Post by boorules60 on Feb 16, 2006 23:30:12 GMT -4
I might put this all in a new thread called "Chris Bashing" or "Fuck Chris"
|
|
|
quiz
Feb 17, 2006 15:29:23 GMT -4
Post by pcups on Feb 17, 2006 15:29:23 GMT -4
Fuck Chris sounds like a good title!
|
|
|
quiz
Mar 19, 2006 17:44:49 GMT -4
Post by boorules60 on Mar 19, 2006 17:44:49 GMT -4
Here's another quiz for you...
Ben and D will easily triumph over Patrick and Tim when we rematch? Yes, they have no idea how quickly they will fall below the Russian/Ottoman power.
Ben and Patrick will crush D and Tim next time? You betcha! Not even close...
People online fall before the free for all peasent rush? Oh yeah they do, lol.
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 24, 2007 23:00:08 GMT -4
Post by d on Jan 24, 2007 23:00:08 GMT -4
Who's hot and who's not. Josh 7 wins in last 10 games. Pcups 9 of 10. His only lost was with B and T. B has won only 1/2 of his recent games. D hasn't won since we did the puma rush.
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 24, 2007 23:10:00 GMT -4
Post by allbinx on Jan 24, 2007 23:10:00 GMT -4
...D... ur slacken
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 25, 2007 1:43:09 GMT -4
Post by boorules60 on Jan 25, 2007 1:43:09 GMT -4
Josh's recent games VS. LOWER opponents (other than ones where he played w/me):
NAME Skill Win Percent Silkk 14.70816 43% ICE_MAN 15.94476 41% sapristy 6.61998 47% Jimboranger18.58152 53% VFT_Pivert 18.83566 47% SultanGizem 8.94186 43% Ryubei 17.65775 56% boruc 19.27158 46% aimo_1 17.74557 55%
Josh's recent games VS. HIGHER opponents (other than ones where he played w/me):
PoPPa_PiLL 20.70095 48% mr_kjaer 22.43849 60%
It has taken him 105 games to get where I was in 40. Am I impressed? Not one bit. Conclusion: Josh = Noob Basher
==========================================================
P_Cups and Punky are nominally better about opponents skill, but it's still not everything. However, congrats to P_Cups for beating 2 captains 1v1, not an easy feat. I did see a loss to someone ranked lower than Josh though... naughty naughty.
==========================================================
D, on the other hand, only has ONE legitimate loss on the WC which should have been a win if we'd done a better job preparing and communicating. His other 8 losses are because Mike, Chris, Arseney, and Colin have all used his account at one point or another.
==========================================================
I don't want to see a counter argument about me because if you look at my recent games, my opponent's skill levels are between 15 and 28 (mine is 21.6) and only about 60% of them are against lower ranks. One loss I can attribute to 1v1 which I suck at, and the other was because I played against PCups Josh and Tim and got stuck with a noob who rushed with Xbows. Tim and I had a sucky loss yesterday against some people actually had a great strat of massing their army over my dead explorer so I couldn't rebuild my TC.
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 25, 2007 14:40:52 GMT -4
Post by pcups on Jan 25, 2007 14:40:52 GMT -4
Yea, and the two civs i played against werent the easiest either, but because of hte new quick search im stuck playing against a master seargent or major so i cant help it.
Hah, josh you noob basher.
And ben, i cant take all hte credit for one win that day, i think i had 4, it was against a 1st lt and he strelet rushed me, thank HIIM for my win. I hadnt seen a strelet rush in so long! I was in heaven!
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 25, 2007 15:28:22 GMT -4
Post by boorules60 on Jan 25, 2007 15:28:22 GMT -4
Yeah, I can blame myself for the loss in the game with Tim cuz I should have gotten my explorer the hell out of dodge earlier (but bad luck has its role too). Also Tim, what happened at the end of that game when you said you were done? Did you just run out of resources because you had the high score for most of the game? I'm not sure why the three of us lost that one game, but we really shouldn't have. I don't think any one of us played up to par. Also, I'd like to blame Josh for another loss the three of us had where he was the first to have a barracks up and still had fewest units produced and killed other than Tim who got rushed.
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 25, 2007 20:08:49 GMT -4
Post by pcups on Jan 25, 2007 20:08:49 GMT -4
I think tim needs a pure rush deck? all else in favor? oh yea, everyone? Tim, you do all this weird shit, something to do about your "economy" well, a rush aint very rush if you dont rush. I really dont give a shit if you have the most resources at the end of the game or the highest score, i just care that you fucking own, and win. So trust us, we arent gonna think you are a bad player just by having a pure rush deck, with some AFTER RUSH BOOM CARDS. NOT BEFORE RUSH BOOM CARDS. Like that fucking bank wagon???!?!??!?!?!
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 25, 2007 20:40:40 GMT -4
Post by boorules60 on Jan 25, 2007 20:40:40 GMT -4
Agreed. Tim, you deck should have 700 and 600 of each resource, as well as skirm, hussar, and possibly pikemen shipments. Only after you have the essentials should you put in the fast building cav, banks, upgrades, and such. Moreover, your third age cards should be all the good unit shipments that you can come up with. Building HP, bank wagons, and tulip speculation are probably out. My ultimate rush deck as I call it wins and losses me games. I can keep building grenadiers for 5-6 minutes, 5 at a time, non-stop... and my peasant pop usually doesn't suffer. With all the wood shipments, there is no need to have people on wood (especially w/silk roads) and only enough people on food to have a non-stop stream of units. The rest, for you, should be on gold for lots of peasants and skims/hussars/grenadiers.
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 26, 2007 11:38:50 GMT -4
Post by pcups on Jan 26, 2007 11:38:50 GMT -4
yep, its all about speed and consistency, i notice that time only builds 10 or 15 grenadiers and then calls its quits. My Spanish rush deck or my Iroquois rush deck have non stop rods/tomahawks
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 26, 2007 13:41:36 GMT -4
Post by punkybruster on Jan 26, 2007 13:41:36 GMT -4
I always build grens first, then banks. I build 15 grens because I don't need any more. If my allies can protect me (thy usually do) then my grens don't die. If my allies die, I die, and there are no people to protect grens. At that point its most effective to protect against the counter attack. Usually this means skirms or aging to get ruyters and cannons. When Ben did his pure grenadier rush, he built 17 grens in 8:00. I build 15 grens, but 3 banks. Each has merits, but it's my choice to give myself to oppertunity to mass art and ruyters in the 3rd age by getting banks in the second.
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 26, 2007 14:23:04 GMT -4
Post by pcups on Jan 26, 2007 14:23:04 GMT -4
you wouldnt even need to get to the 3rd age if we just destroyed them out right.
|
|
|
quiz
Jan 27, 2007 18:55:50 GMT -4
Post by boorules60 on Jan 27, 2007 18:55:50 GMT -4
Marching Spartan is hot. Over 5 skill levels in one day...
|
|
|
quiz
Mar 10, 2008 17:42:38 GMT -4
Post by d on Mar 10, 2008 17:42:38 GMT -4
Sunday's Sudoku
x2x 8x5 x1x 45x xxx x96 xxx xxx xxx
6xx 7x8 xx4 xxx xxx xxx 7xx 9x4 xx3
xxx xxx xxx 54x xxx x62 x7x 1x2 x8x
|
|